Content deleted Content added
→‎Please change the logo: Answer to Mirzali
Line 1,811:
:::Dear Ali,
:::my answer is to ''Xosere''. My concern is more about the Kurdish alphabet and elements, which he so forcibly defends and not about ''ho'' and ''xo''. Both are Zazaish words and are therefore equivalent. The arguments in support of his friends had betrayed him what plans he has. Further discussions would be meaningless and we would not get it anywhere. What I do not understand why we are accused with such a nonsensical name like ''Zazacı''? We are real Zazas and not so-called ''Zazacı''s. It is quite natural, therefore, that we commit ourselves as engaged for Zazaki. Other nations do the same for their own language. It is not our job to defend other languages, while our language is still short on the track. We are concerned primarily about Zazaki. Our problem is not Turkish or Kurdish, and that is why we are still far from being racist. It is only our natural right to protect our language by consciously artificial foreign influences. As I said, everything else is absurd in polemical arguments and political views and that justifies nobody under these pretexts to destroy our project. --[[User:Mirzali|Mirzali]] 14:28, 24 Tişrino Peyên 2009 (UTC)
 
:::: Okay Bıra, I see. Let tell me te facts
 
::::*Xosere said in the mail, that we can change the logo
::::*"Ho" is the most original variant and exists according to Xosere also in Central Zazaki sub-dialects
:::: So to Xosere: What is now your problem? To Mirzali: Please change the logo, Xosere is not the owner of Wikipedia. The variant "ho" is the most original and the most right choose. --[[User:AliErsoy|AliErsoy]] 18:31, 24 Tişrino Peyên 2009 (UTC)